**Paste:**#107607**Author(s):**Anonymous Coward, geophf and 1HaskellADay**Language:**Haskell**Channel:**-**Created:**2014-07-16 19:03:27 UTC**Revisions:**- 2015-10-08 02:49:43 UTC #8278780132848566272 (diff): No title (Anonymous Coward)
- 2015-10-02 19:13:28 UTC #546112942886617088 (diff): No title (Anonymous Coward)
- 2015-10-02 19:10:23 UTC #8646426009081479168 (diff): No title (Anonymous Coward)
- 2015-05-06 00:03:54 UTC #341032678318931968 (diff): No title (Anonymous Coward)
- 2014-12-18 20:39:43 UTC #116816 (diff): No title (Anonymous Coward)
- 2014-11-17 21:07:47 UTC #114459 (diff): No title (geophf)
- 2014-09-01 03:18:04 UTC #110327 (diff): No title (1HaskellADay)
- 2014-08-29 17:14:45 UTC #110191 (diff): No title (1HaskellADay)
- 2014-07-22 15:18:31 UTC #107887 (diff): No title (Anonymous Coward)
- 2014-07-16 19:03:27 UTC #107607: I got'cher DList right here! (1HaskellADay)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 | module Control.DList where import Control.Arrow (app) import Control.Monad import Control.Monad.Trans.Writer import Data.Monoid infixr 5 |> infixl 5 <| {-- Your basic difference list, from Haskell to Idris, and back This answers the Haskell exercise posed at http://lpaste.net/107593 --} data DList a = DL { unDL :: [a] -> [a] } cons :: a -> [a] -> [a] cons a list = a : list (<|) :: DList a -> a -> DList a dlist <| a = DL ((unDL dlist) . (cons a)) (|>) :: a -> DList a -> DList a a |> dlist = DL ((cons a) . (unDL dlist)) emptyDL :: DList a emptyDL = DL id dlToList :: DList a -> [a] dlToList dlist = unDL dlist [] -- added a fromList for difference lists to start from somewhere dl :: [a] -> DList a dl = DL . (++) dl' :: a -> DList a -- your monadic return dl' x = dl [x] -- DLists are monoidal (perfect for writing to *cough* Writer *cough*) instance Monoid (DList a) where mempty = emptyDL d1 `mappend` d2 = DL (unDL d1 . unDL d2) samp :: Writer (DList Char) () -- from Writer w a samp = (\f twoB -> mapM_ f [twoB, " or not ", twoB]) (tell . dl) "to be" -- *Control.DList> dlToList $ snd $ runWriter samp ~> "to be or not to be" -- So now let's make DList a monad -- which means we have to make it a Functor, then an Applicative one -- You know: because monads are functors. -- No, they aren't but in Haskell they are required to be, because reasons. instance Monad DList where return = pure difflist >>= f = {-- ugh! --} mconcat . map f $ dlToList difflist -- but to be a monad these days, you MUST be applicative, so ... instance Applicative DList where pure = dl' dlfs <*> dlargs = dl $ zipWith (curry app) (dlToList dlfs) (dlToList dlargs) -- but applicative needs to be a functor, so ... instance Functor DList where fmap f = dl . map f . dlToList -- and while we're at it, let's make DList a Foldable instance {-- Okay, last week, we looked at improving the views on DList so that we could make it a monad, so that it could participate with MultiMap, which has a requirement of monadicity on the element-container-class. But is that the 'right' improvement? Looking at MultiMap, it's not so that a contain should be a monad, because what is the usage for these containers? Their monadicity? No, it's their foldability. This exercise is inspired by @argumatronic xxx. What is a Foldable instance? (quick lookup of Data.Foldable) A Foldable instance is something that which can be folded. (audience, sarcastically: Thank you, geophf) me: yer welcks. So, (... or maybe we need to ba Traversable, too?) (... I'll put more thought into this ... laterz). So, if what we need, really, is a Foldable instance (not a Monad), then we need to make DList a Foldable instance, too. Today's Haskell exercise: declare DList to be Foldable and define the Foldable functions for it. --} instance Foldable DList where foldr f z = foldr f z . dlToList -- let's talk Traversibility, now: {-- a solution to the problem posted at http://lpaste.net/4868288594713772032 So, we made DList a Foldable instance, all for @argumatronic, and she was grateful for the source material for @HaskellBook ... (geophf waits for the influx of gratitude) ... but then she was all like, "Phfeh! Foldable is so yesterday! Traversable is where it's at! Get with the times!" So, there's that. So, Traversable. What is it? traversable, adj.: that which can be traversed, see traversable. (audience, sarcastic: gee! thanks, geophf!) (geophf: yer welcks) Okay, but seriously, looking at the documentation for Data.Traversable, we see that class (Functor t, Foldable t) => Traversable t where ... Well, as we've done yesterday and the proceeding week, we've already made DList a Functor (and an Applicative Functor, no less, which will come in (very) handy today) and, yesterday, made it Foldable, so we've met the prerequisites of being able to make DList Traversable. What is the power of traversibility? Well, if you have some arbitrary type, t, that's a Traversable type, then you know you can map(M) or sequence over it... ... and as we learned in the '70s, being able to map over a type is a very powerful and useful thing to have. So, let's do this for DList: let's make DList a Traversable instance. Generally, with Applicative Functors, as the minimally-complete definition is traverse or sequenceA. Let's do this. --} instance Traversable DList where traverse f = (pure dl <*>) . traverse f . dlToList |

24:18: Warning: Redundant bracket

Found:

(unDL dlist) . (cons a)

Why not:

unDL dlist . (cons a)

24:18: Warning: Redundant bracket

Found:

(unDL dlist) . (cons a)

Why not:

(unDL dlist) . cons a

27:18: Warning: Redundant bracket

Found:

(cons a) . (unDL dlist)

Why not:

cons a . (unDL dlist)

27:18: Warning: Redundant bracket

Found:

(cons a) . (unDL dlist)

Why not:

(cons a) . unDL dlist